Comment on Manchikanti et al's ACOEM guideline criticism.
نویسندگان
چکیده
As practicing interventional pain physicians, we were pleased to see the point-by-point evaluation of the recent ACOEM guidelines (1,2). Although the 400page ACOEM chapters at first glance appear impressive, through this analysis it becomes clear that the ACOEM chapters are fatally flawed. Unfortunately, insurance companies have been quick to accept any information that allows them to deny payment. Manchikanti et al (1-3) have illustrated clearly that these guidelines fail to incorporate much of the medical literature including the best available evidence in support of these therapies. Manchikanti et al have done a thorough, scholarly, and rigorous evaluation of the ACOEM guidelines, and provided the pain community with a solid basis for rebutting insurance denials. At any rate, we fear that universal adoption of these flawed guidelines will impair patients’ access to interventional pain medicine therapies within and outside the worker’s compensation arena. This would be an injustice to the entire pain patient population. Lora L. Brown, MD Coastal Pain Management and Rehabilitation 6015 Pointe West Boulevard Bradenton, FL 34209 [email protected]
منابع مشابه
In reference to Manchikanti et al's criticism of ACOEM guidelines.
Regarding Manchikanti et al’s recent articles A Critical Appraisal of Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines for Interventional Pain Management and Review of Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines for Interventional Pain Management and Potential Implications (1,2), it is ironic that the authors purport to evaluate methods for the collection of evidence, but rely on flawed methodology (e.g...
متن کاملIn Support of Manchikanti et al ACOEM guideline criticisms.
I have been involved in the field of Pain Medicine for some 22 years now, and have seen the incredible progress in the development of more effective treatments for our chronic pain patients. It is with great interest that I read the 2 articles (1,2). I have been aware of the ACOEM guidelines and I am heartened that Pain Physician has published these 2 articles to make their readership aware of ...
متن کاملACOEM guideline analysis.
The recent series of 3 articles published in Pain Physician regarding the ACOEM guidelines represented a significant new approach to evidence analysis and guideline synthesis by the addition of guideline criticism (1-3). The manner in which the articles were written attempt to objectively and strictly apply the methods of analysis and synthesis as proposed by prominent agencies and medical soci...
متن کاملReassessment of evidence synthesis of occupational medicine practice guidelines for interventional pain management.
BACKGROUND Appropriately developed practice guidelines present statements of best practice based on a thorough evaluation of the evidence from published studies on the outcomes of treatments, which include the application of multiple methods for collecting and evaluating evidence for a wide range of clinical interventions and disciplines. However, the guidelines are neither infallible, nor a su...
متن کاملA critical review of the American Pain Society clinical practice guidelines for interventional techniques: part 1. Diagnostic interventions.
BACKGROUND Clinical guidelines are defined as systematically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances. The clinical guideline industry has been erupting even faster than innovation in health care, constantly adding unhealthy perspectives with broad and complex mandates to health care interventions. Clinic...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Pain physician
دوره 11 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008